Re: When font-size and font size collide

----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Glazman <>
To: Tantek Celik <>
Cc: L. David Baron <>; <>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: When font-size and font size collide

> Tantek Celik a écrit :
> >
> > > However, I *think* <font size="+2"> is often treated as relative to
> > > base font size of the document, not the font size of the parent
> > > element.
> >
> > It is.  FONT SIZE=+/- is pretty bizarre and completely unrepresentable
> > CSS.
> Right.

But when BASEFONT assumes the default value (3), there should be no
difference between using signed and unsigned values, correct?

> Next problem : FONT SIZE=+3 cannot be easily deprecated because it is
> not possible in CSS to declare that the font size of an element should
> be increased or decreased by more than one arbitrary unit... The %
> values do not easily solve the problem.
> I'd really love to make these FONT elements disappear from all my
> documents but it is a very dirty job w/o such a feature.

Since CSS has no notion corresponding to BASEFONT (fortunately!), I would
think that

  font-size: xx-large;

should do the job (assuming you're using "normal" for the default text
size--and there are few good reasons not to do that). If you want a
*particular* relationship between sizes, ems or percentage are appropriate.

Braden N. McDaniel

Received on Tuesday, 17 August 1999 22:31:34 UTC