- From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 18:52:31 -0800
- To: Matthew Lye <mlye@trentu.ca>, "W3C style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Matthew Lye wrote: > A test page somewhere consisting merely of a list with each code > alongside a description of what the character ought to look like would be > useful for checking compliance... in general, that sort of thing would be > useful to resolve compliance issues. Developers might go the little > extra distance to be fully X-compliant rather than 'X-compliant!!!' if it > was easy to point out that actually, they weren't.... test pages might > be a plausible W3C activity. I'm aware of several test pages hiding around W3C servers, though none comprehensive. I think there's been a political issue in W3C publicizing how short of the mark member companies are falling. I hope that's changing. It seems to me that the specif - er, the "Recommendation" itself ought to be annotated with live examples and sample renderings of the properties being introduced. __________________ Todd Fahrner mailto:fahrner@pobox.com
Received on Sunday, 8 February 1998 21:47:58 UTC