- From: Neil St.Laurent <neil@bigpic.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 13:54:28 -0600
- To: Douglas Rand <drand@sgi.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
> Not an argument for breaking bc. As above - the spec is not easy to > follow. It is not suprising that nobody has it right. If you are referring to the grammar used by CSS then I could probably provide a real grammar for the language -- the one we are using to parse CSS2. The grammar provided by the specification I find to be laid out very bad and has errors in it. __ | Mortar: Advanced Web Development <http://mortar.bigpic.com/> | Neil St.Laurent <mailto:stlaurent@bigpic.com> | Big Picture Multimedia
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 1997 15:48:38 UTC