Re: Backwards compatibility of new selectors (was: Color mo

> 1) That the grammer initially supplied was no good - it took alot of
> work to make a yacc parser (for example) out of it..

We're not making a yacc parser.  Our grammar (to calm any concerns 
from point 2) is a correct implementation based on the provided 
grammar.  Our grammar is more EBNF like in nature and is complete, 
including all the parsing for all of the rules, correct locations of 
white space, etc...

We have a grammar for the selectors as well.
__
| Mortar: Advanced Web Development <http://mortar.bigpic.com/>
| Neil St.Laurent                  <mailto:stlaurent@bigpic.com>
| Big Picture Multimedia

Received on Tuesday, 2 December 1997 15:59:21 UTC