- From: Scott E. Preece <preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 14:26:14 -0500
- To: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
- Cc: reddik@thegroup.net, www-style@w3.org
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> | | A style sheet is _not_ appropriate for the eccentric spacing of an eccentric | poem. Neither is HTML. HTML cannot, and will never be the perfect langauge | everything anyone wants to be. If such a language were possible, it would | have been invented years ago. --- So, who made you king of what was appropriate content? If the appropriate content model for HTML is just plain text in common document structure, then most of the content of the Web is inappropriate for HTML and the domain of HTML interest is the tiny subset of people who have common-or-garden documents and aren't sophisticated enough to want DocBook or other more detailed markup. --- | PDF is perfect for a poem with eccentric layout needs and supported in | browsers on all major GUI platforms. --- Now that PDF is going native in the major browsers, it may well be a better path for most of the content of the Web. With page-by-page serving and tools for indexing and extracting content, I'm not sure I see what advantage HTML has anymore, for most authors. It's too simple for people who care about structure and too complicated for people who don't. SPACER is about as innocuous tag as I can imagine. It can be happily ignored by unaware browsers and does nothing to obscure the content from tools. So what's the beef? scott -- scott preece motorola/mcg urbana design center 1101 e. university, urbana, il 61801 phone: 217-384-8589 fax: 217-384-8550 internet mail: preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 1996 15:24:41 UTC