- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 95 00:00:49 -0500
- To: "Benjamin C. W. Sittler" <bsittler@prism.nmt.edu>
- Cc: www-style@www10.w3.org
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 21:16:29 -0700 (MST) From: "Benjamin C. W. Sittler" <bsittler@prism.nmt.edu> I for one would not implement or use CSS1 if it offered no features not implemented in existing browsers. Clearly CSS1 even with the changes I suggested still offers features not available in most existing browsers; namely, the ability to use a style sheet on a per document basis. By itself, this is significant. I would think that this would be the most important goal of CSS1 rather than introducing flashy new formatting features beyond the most commonly used set. As I see it, CSS is going to be doomed if convergence isn't reached quickly on the basic framework. Once that is in place, adding new style properties is doesn't require much work in terms of syntax or specification language. I should think CSS1 would limit its scope to the basic framework in order to reach quick consensus and get implementations out the door. Of course, nobody who bothers to do CSS1 is going to stop there. But, with all the continual changes and additions of "this is a neat formatting trick, let's put in a property for it", nobody is going to commit to CSS at all. Our viewer already supports many style properties beyond CSS1 but I'm not trying to force them on everyone at this point. I'd be happy to have people using a limited set of properties just to get them used to the idea of style sheets, etc. If you want to pick a couple of neat properties just to add flash to CSS1, then that's fine. But let's agree up front what they are and stop trying to add too much. If I was to pick one or two, I'd choose dropped caps and first line small-caps. But, please, let's leave animated background lighting out of CSS1. Regards, Glenn Adams
Received on Friday, 1 December 1995 00:01:06 UTC