- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:29:36 +0100 (BST)
- To: Graham Klyne <gk@NineByNine.org>
- cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
hi Graham Unfortunately my machine got hacked, and so the tests aren't available and the squish BNF (my implementation) is also down. It's cached on google though: http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:b9TmvUcIp4gJ:swordfish.rdfweb.org/rdfquery/squish-bnf.html+squish+bnf&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 There are various versions of squish - mine has some constraint clauses although several people (e.g. Matt Biddulph and Dan Brickley) have conjunctive query only versions. There's no spec as such, just the BNF (which has various issues as Sean pointed out) The tests should probably be on the W3C site somewhere - we will sort that out. Swordfish should hopefully be back tomorrow. My implementation of squish actually differs from the "3 implementations" paper, which is really more like RDQL. An HTML version of that paper is also available: http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/2002/05/squish-iscw/ cheers Libby On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Graham Klyne wrote: > > Can someone point me at the most recent version of the SquishQL spec? > > Does the April 2002 "3 implementations" paper [1] still reasonably > represent the current status? > > (BTW, swordfish.rdfweb.org seems to be down, so I can't check some of the > pages that Google finds.) > > #g > -- > > [1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-110.html > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 14:30:54 UTC