- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:50:05 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 04:20 29/01/04 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: >Draft meeting page is at >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/meetings/tp2004.html > >As you can see, the agenda needs more work. I suggest we discuss >agenda here (www-rdf-interest) with proposals for lightning talks, >presentations etc by 9Feb for a finalised agenda 15Feb. > >Hope to see some of you there, I shall attend -- I'm sure there's lots of interesting stuff for us to discuss. But I see the agenda is currently very bare. There are two possible topics that are close to my interests, one general, one technical: (a) how to present RDF and Semantic Web technologies to a wider audience in a way that makes a compelling case for their use (where appropriate). Related to this, what makes an application a good candidate for employing Semantic Web technology? (b) how RDF applications can/should use the datatype capabilities that have been designed into RDF. The only formally sanctioned use of these of which I am aware is their use by OWL for cardinality constraints. (I have done a little work on this area [1,2], and could offer a lightning talk if there's interest; what's the expected format/duration for these?) #g -- [1] http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/RDF-Datatype-inference.html [2] http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/Swish/Intro.html ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 21:04:38 UTC