- From: Victor Lindesay <victor@schemaweb.info>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:36:27 -0000
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Charles: > This would be give or take quite a few. Thinking for 3 minutes: Give us a chance Charles, SchemaWeb has only been going for a few weeks. As for coverage, I would reckon that SchemaWeb contains a very significant proportion of all schemas and ontologies published on the web in RDF/XML. Let's not delude ourselves; RDF is still a minority sport. >Which is why the task of trying to list them (and make it possible to search >for properties and classes related to some task before creating yet another >one) is at the same time very important ... I agree. But humans designing schemas are not the sole use case for schema portals and repositories. Schemas are also a very important part of the RDF technology stack and access to schemas is vital for software agents. Or have I misread the roadmap... http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2004 04:42:31 UTC