- From: Teresa Carcelén <tcarcele@di.uc3m.es>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 18:57:05 +0200 (CEST)
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
Thank at all, I´m agree that RDF is a great paradox. I´m going crazy with this. Then rdfs:Resource and rdfs:Class are practicaly the same thing because both are resources and classes...but I´ve read several examples where the root oh the hierarchy is rdfs:Resource and their sons are rdfs:Class and rdf:Property Is it correct if I assume that rdfs:Resource is the root class and rdfs:Class and rdf:Property their sons?? In the latest specification of RDF Schema are the follows definitions: rdfs:Resource All things described by RDF are called resources, and are instances of the class rdfs:Resource. This is the class of everything. All other classes are subclasses of this class. rdfs:Resource is an instance of rdfs:Class. rdfs:Class This is the class of resources that are RDF classes. rdfs:Class is an instance of rdfs:Class. Thank very much Cheers -- -- ******************************** Teresa Carcelén Fernández Universidad Carlos III de Madrid tcarcele@di.uc3m.es ********************************
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 12:57:11 UTC