- From: Francesco Cannistrà <fracan@inwind.it>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 18:34:15 +0200
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>, "Teresa Carcelén" <tcarcele@di.uc3m.es>, "Www-Rdf-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Www-Rdf-Interest-Request" <www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org>
> The simplest way to understand is as follows. > rdfs:Class is the set of all Class names, which includes rdfs:Resource. > rdfs:Resource is the top of the Class hierarchy, and every Class > is a descendent of rdfs:Resource. I wouldn't want to wake up Bertrand Russel, but I let you note that, on the one hand, rdfs:Resource is a resource of type rdfs:Class, on the other hand, rdfs:Class, as everythink within RDF, is a resource itself, i.e., an instance of the rdfs:Resource ... ... I think there is no way to avoid this paradox Francesco
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 12:34:28 UTC