- From: Emmanuel Pietriga <epietriga@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:30:52 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Marjolein Katsma <wkf1s1l9yfpruqn001@sneakemail.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Marjolein, the W3C RDF Validator should soon be updated. I am currently updating it to ARP 2, but I need to run some tests before making it public. Emmanuel -- Emmanuel Pietriga (emmanuel@w3.org) | MIT - Laboratory for Computer Science World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) | Room NE43-344 tel: +1 617.253.5327 | 200 Technology Square fax: +1 617.258.5999 | Cambridge, MA 02139 http://www.w3.org/People/Emmanuel/ Jeremy Carroll wrote: >The underlying engine is ARP. > >parseType="Collection" was supported in the ARP released with Jena 1.6.0, >and the latest ARP also supports rdf:datatype. > >I would suggest downloading the latest ARP from >http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc/arp > >and running it locally while the W3C catches up. > >Jeremy > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org >>[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Marjolein Katsma >>Sent: 19 January 2003 18:19 >>To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org >>Subject: W3C RDF Validator question >> >> >> >>Hi All, >> >>I tried the W3C RDF Validator for the first time today, to check >>how I'm doing with the beginning of my "catalog" RDF. It nicely >>caught an incorrect end tag; but once I had that corrected I >>found it doesn't recognize rdf:parseType="Collection" (it >>generates a warning for that) - which of course is precisely what >>I'm using for collections of things in my "catalog". As a result, >>almost nothing was parsed. >> >>Does anyone have any idea when the validator will be updated to >>support everything in the revised RDF/XML syntax (8 November >>2002) as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar >>(which is what I'm using)? Or will this need to reach >>recommendation status before it will be implemented in the validator? >> >>Any other suggestions for checking/validating what I'm writing? >>I had expected a little bit more than just XML well-formedness >>which is all I seem to be getting now. >> >> >> >>-- >>Marjolein Katsma >>HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/ >>Java Woman - http://javawoman.com >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2003 08:29:19 UTC