- From: Marjolein Katsma <wkf1s1l9yfpruqn001@sneakemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 21:46:54 +0100
- To: "Emmanuel Pietriga epietriga-at-yahoo.fr |rdf/1.0-Allow|" <gg3ah90o6v0t@sneakemail.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Emmanuel, Thanks, that's great - I'll be looking forward to your announcement on this list (at least that's where I assume it will be announced)! At 15:30 2003-01-20, Emmanuel Pietriga wrote: >Marjolein, > >the W3C RDF Validator should soon be updated. I am currently updating it to ARP 2, but I need to run some tests before making it public. > >Emmanuel > >-- >Emmanuel Pietriga (emmanuel@w3.org) | MIT - Laboratory for Computer Science >World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) | Room NE43-344 >tel: +1 617.253.5327 | 200 Technology Square >fax: +1 617.258.5999 | Cambridge, MA 02139 >http://www.w3.org/People/Emmanuel/ > > > >Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >>The underlying engine is ARP. >> >>parseType="Collection" was supported in the ARP released with Jena 1.6.0, >>and the latest ARP also supports rdf:datatype. >> >>I would suggest downloading the latest ARP from >>http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc/arp >> >>and running it locally while the W3C catches up. >> >>Jeremy And thanks, Jeremy! >>>-----Original Message----- [snip] >>>Does anyone have any idea when the validator will be updated to >>>support everything in the revised RDF/XML syntax (8 November >>>2002) as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar >>>(which is what I'm using)? Or will this need to reach >>>recommendation status before it will be implemented in the validator? [snip] >>>-- >>>Marjolein Katsma >>>HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/ >>>Java Woman - http://javawoman.com -- Marjolein Katsma HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/ Java Woman - http://javawoman.com
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 15:47:07 UTC