- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:09:49 +0100
- To: "Marjolein Katsma" <wkf1s1l9yfpruqn001@sneakemail.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
The underlying engine is ARP. parseType="Collection" was supported in the ARP released with Jena 1.6.0, and the latest ARP also supports rdf:datatype. I would suggest downloading the latest ARP from http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc/arp and running it locally while the W3C catches up. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Marjolein Katsma > Sent: 19 January 2003 18:19 > To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: W3C RDF Validator question > > > > Hi All, > > I tried the W3C RDF Validator for the first time today, to check > how I'm doing with the beginning of my "catalog" RDF. It nicely > caught an incorrect end tag; but once I had that corrected I > found it doesn't recognize rdf:parseType="Collection" (it > generates a warning for that) - which of course is precisely what > I'm using for collections of things in my "catalog". As a result, > almost nothing was parsed. > > Does anyone have any idea when the validator will be updated to > support everything in the revised RDF/XML syntax (8 November > 2002) as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar > (which is what I'm using)? Or will this need to reach > recommendation status before it will be implemented in the validator? > > Any other suggestions for checking/validating what I'm writing? > I had expected a little bit more than just XML well-formedness > which is all I seem to be getting now. > > > > -- > Marjolein Katsma > HomeSite Help - http://hshelp.com/ > Java Woman - http://javawoman.com > >
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 04:10:14 UTC