- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 02:22:20 -0800
- To: David Menendez <zednenem@psualum.com>
- CC: rdfig <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
David Menendez wrote: > > At 1:04 PM -0800 2002-11-21, Seth Russell wrote: > >> I totally agree. I really don't understand why we can't just agree to >> refer to the set of triples (the model) encoded by the document at >> <urlA> as <urlA#ThisGraph>. > > > What about graphs that are not encoded by documents with URIs? Ok, take for example the graph of all RSS items that contain the key word phrases "Star Trek", "uiversal translator", and "GroupFormingHere". Granted there is no particular document that encodes that graph at 2:15 AM on 11/22/2002. But it is still our intention to find this graph and give it a URI so we can talk about it, right? Is that your question? Seth Russell
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 05:22:58 UTC