- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:48:45 +0000
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "David Menendez" <zednenem@psualum.com>
Richard, I'm finding this conversation rather frustrating. You have claimed there are logical flaws in RDF(S). I'm trying to understand what you mean when you said: [[<<this is true, but RDF Schema should use proper subsets instead of subsets. Using subsets logically permits such absurdities as: the set of all men is identical to the set of all animals.>>]] Please explain the logical flaw. You have explained some notation so far. Fine. Now for the flaw? Brian
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 04:47:25 UTC