- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:29:10 -0800
- To: "David Menendez" <zednenem@psualum.com>
- Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 20:29:11 UTC
You said:
If you're seeing something in what I wrote that implies that rdf:Property is a subclass of rdfs:Class, please point it out to me.
The thing that I saw was your definition of rdfs:Class as being the set of y such that
x rdf:type y
from that and
z rdf:type rdfs:Property
it follows that
rdfs:Property subClassOf rdfs:Class
If RDF-MT doesn't agree, then RDF-MT is wrong (or your definition of rdfs:Class is wrong).
That stirs up some vague recollections of Pat Hayes' statements that RDF-MT doesn't agree with reality.
I need to go back & read his statements again.
============
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done
knowledge haspart list of proposition
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 20:29:11 UTC