- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:26:18 -0500 (EST)
- To: danny666@virgilio.it (Danny Ayers)
- Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan), xml-dev@lists.xml.org (Xml-Dev), www-rdf-interest@w3.org (RDF-Interest)
Danny Ayers scripsit:
> I can understand the need for an <rdf:RDF> wall around embedded RDF in the
> current syntax (to keep its Gothic structure out of sight). If however the
> RDF was restricted to (decapitated) one-layer statements, I reckon an
> <rdf:D> ha-ha is adequate.
Actually, rdf:RDF isn't required, and Reuters Health doesn't use it.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
.e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2002 21:29:14 UTC