- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:43:13 +0100
- To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: "Xml-Dev" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
>Your rdf:D element is the same as rdf:Description, with an implied >rdf:about >attribute whose value is "". Thanks John, I should have made that clear myself ;-) I can understand the need for an <rdf:RDF> wall around embedded RDF in the current syntax (to keep its Gothic structure out of sight). If however the RDF was restricted to (decapitated) one-layer statements, I reckon an <rdf:D> ha-ha is adequate.
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2002 14:54:44 UTC