- From: Arnold deVos <adv@langdale.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 16:23:52 +1000
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hi, From: "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> > [...] For a > second-order language you need a universe which has things and also > has relations in it (not just defined on it, but actually contained > in it.) [...] I think the term "2nd order" is used in this sense in the RDF M&S spec. Maybe the authors should comment on whether they meant to use the technical meaning of "2nd order" or whether they were using the tern loosely. - Arnold -- Arnold deVos Langdale Consultants adv@langdale.com.au
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 02:21:37 UTC