- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
- Date: 21 Oct 2000 19:47:46 +0200
- To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "'Arnold deVos'" <adv@langdale.com.au>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, rdf@uxn.nu
"McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> writes: > > wraf:Model - A collection of statements > > Is that a collection of statements or a collection of > reified statements? All statements can be viewed as reified statements. I recently came to insight that fact and non-fact statements can be handled by the model. Since all statements belongs to one (or more) models, we can have trusted and nontrusted models. A reified statement with a unknown stater will be placed in a 'empty' model. Things can be said about a model in the same manner that they can be said about separate statements. Some of the statements about the model could be made distributed over the statements. Wraf uses a lot of 'dynamic' properties. They can be inferred from schemas, calculated, providing extra metadata, be translations or alternative representations, or anything returned from a method call. -- / Jonas Liljegren The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/ Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2000 13:52:50 UTC