- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:41:29 -0800
- To: Ora Lassila <daml@lassila.org>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Ora Lassila wrote: > Seth Russell wrote: > > Well I don't know about parsers, but I didn't have any problems building a > > mentograph of this :)) > > > > http://robustai.net/mentography/abouteach.html > > Cute graph, but unfortunately it has very little to do with how RDF is > supposed to be parsed :-( > > First, the way we *defined* things in the RDF M+S, there should be only > one "documents" arc, not two. Yes, but certainly [x , p, [[] , rdf_1, y]] is meant to be interpreted as [x, p, y] ... isn't it? > Second, even if there were two arcs, why would you point them to the > "creator" arcs, and not the XYZ and ABC nodes? That is just a short hand interpretation simplifying the details. see [Arcs can be objects] http://robustai.net/mentography/arcarc.jpg Seth Russell
Received on Friday, 1 December 2000 14:38:38 UTC