Re: Form Post from Firefox

* Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> [2006-05-01 11:32-0400]
> Just to clarify things, I don't think there are "RDF specs" and "RDF 
> syntax" affected other than RDF/XML are there?

RDF/XML yup, perhaps GRDDL, RDF/A might touch on this too; but I was also 
thinking about any future alternate XML encodings. Not that I'm yet
convinced this is needed; I just wanted to make sure the point was noted
on the appropriate list.

cheers,

Dan
> 
> --Frank
> 
> Dan Brickley wrote:
> >Hi Andrew,
> >
> >I'm redirecting this from www-rdf-validator to www-rdf-comments
> >so it'll get picked up by any new work on the RDF specs, since your
> >issue seems to be more to do with the RDF syntax than the W3C
> >validation service. (except for the PNG thing...)
> >
> >cheers,
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >
> >* Andrew Houghton <houghton@bright.net> [2006-04-30 10:54-0400]
> >>report=The validator considers attributes in the xsi namespace on the
> >>RDF/XML document element to be properties, rather than ignoring them as
> >>properties, as it does with attributes in the xml namespace.
> >>
> >>By not ignoring attributes in the xsi namespace you are not able to assign
> >>an XML schema to an RDF/XML instance document.  While assigning an XML
> >>schema is not necessary for RDF/XML you may wish to restrict the structre
> >>and what elements are valid when creating an instance of your metadata.
> >>
> >>BTW, the visual graph (PNG embedded) was working, but then it abruptly
> >>stopped working, saying empty graph file.
> >>
> >>RDF=<?xml version="1.0">
> >><?xml version="1.0"?>
> >><rdf:RDF
> >>  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> >>  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
> >>  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> >>  xml:base="urn:my-base:"
> >>  xml:lang="en"
> >>  xsi:schemaLocation="urn:my-rdf-instance my-rdf-instance.xsd"
> >>  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/">
> >>    <dc:title>World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title> 
> >>  </rdf:Description>
> >></rdf:RDF>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >

Received on Monday, 1 May 2006 15:50:03 UTC