- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 11:32:49 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: Andrew Houghton <houghton@bright.net>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Just to clarify things, I don't think there are "RDF specs" and "RDF syntax" affected other than RDF/XML are there? --Frank Dan Brickley wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I'm redirecting this from www-rdf-validator to www-rdf-comments > so it'll get picked up by any new work on the RDF specs, since your > issue seems to be more to do with the RDF syntax than the W3C > validation service. (except for the PNG thing...) > > cheers, > > Dan > > > * Andrew Houghton <houghton@bright.net> [2006-04-30 10:54-0400] >> report=The validator considers attributes in the xsi namespace on the >> RDF/XML document element to be properties, rather than ignoring them as >> properties, as it does with attributes in the xml namespace. >> >> By not ignoring attributes in the xsi namespace you are not able to assign >> an XML schema to an RDF/XML instance document. While assigning an XML >> schema is not necessary for RDF/XML you may wish to restrict the structre >> and what elements are valid when creating an instance of your metadata. >> >> BTW, the visual graph (PNG embedded) was working, but then it abruptly >> stopped working, saying empty graph file. >> >> RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> <rdf:RDF >> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" >> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" >> xml:base="urn:my-base:" >> xml:lang="en" >> xsi:schemaLocation="urn:my-rdf-instance my-rdf-instance.xsd" >> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/"> >> <dc:title>World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title> >> </rdf:Description> >> </rdf:RDF> >> > > > >
Received on Monday, 1 May 2006 15:27:58 UTC