www-rdf-comments@w3.org from October to December 2004 by thread

Re: W3C specification error Dan Brickley (Monday, 29 November)

• Re: W3C specification error Pat Hayes (Monday, 29 November)
  • Re: W3C specification error Dan Brickley (Monday, 29 November)
    • Re: W3C specification error Frank Manola (Monday, 29 November)
    • Re: W3C specification error Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 30 November)
      • Re: W3C specification error Dan Brickley (Tuesday, 30 November)
  • Re: W3C specification error Andrea Proli (Monday, 29 November)
    • Re: W3C specification error Benja Fallenstein (Tuesday, 30 November)
      • Re: W3C specification error Andrea Proli (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: W3C specification error alex Tvin (Saturday, 11 December)
• Re: W3C specification error Bom Mon (Saturday, 11 December)
• Re: W3C specification error Nobel Ferun (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: W3C specification error Nord File (Saturday, 11 December)
  • Re: W3C specification error Pat Hayes (Thursday, 23 December)

Two points that can be made more clear in RDF/XML REC. Collin Hsu (Friday, 22 October)

TYPO at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/ victory (Wednesday, 20 October)

Last message date: Friday, 31 December 2004 06:49:04 UTC