- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:27:21 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
* Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> [2004-11-30 08:56+0000] > At 15:25 29/11/04 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: > >Yep. I wish we'd given a name to the class of non-Literal resources. > > But that's just the same as rdf:Resource, isn't it? > > I.e., anything that can be denoted by a literal can also be denoted by a > non-literal. I think the problem is that we allowed rdfs:Resource to cover literals. It worries me how quickly my memory of the details have faded, though :( Dan
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 09:27:22 UTC