- From: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:50:43 -0500
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: danbri@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, em@w3.org, w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org
>From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> >Subject: Re: need to determine what RDF is >Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 17:34:33 +0100 > >> At 11:09 30/05/2002 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> >> >The ``deep'' issue is that there continues to be claims that RDF >> >encompasses information not encoded in RDF graphs (or in RDF-defined >> >documents that can be transformed into RDF graphs). The wording >> >associated with rdfs:comment appears to be capable of supporting this view, >> >although, as Pat Hayes has pointed out, it really does not. I suppose that >> >this could be considered to be just wordsmithing, but wordsmithing taking >> >into account the implicit view of RDF. >> >> One of the techniques we have found particularly useful in RDFCore has been >> reducing issues to one or more test cases. Do you think it might be >> possible to create a test case for this issue. >> >> I'm maybe beginning to get a glimmer of what the problem is, but I'm not >> sure. Ramblings that are certainly technically incompetent but illustrate >> an idea follow. I think I'm struggling to make more precise a phrase of >> Peter's "is not part of RDF". >> >> Postulate the existence of Universal Entailment (since "RDF entailment" >> already means something else). The Universal Entailment of an RDF graph is >> the graph which includes all the triples that a processor is entitled to >> conclude from the original graph. >> >> I think Peter's position is that Universal Entailment contains only triples >> entailed by RDF(S) entailment. >> >> Brian > > >Here are two: Here are two more: Case 3: <ex:peggy> <rdf:type> <ex:HumanBeing> . <ex:Jane> <rdfs:comment> "Jane is a human being like Peggy" . ?universally-entail? <ex:Jane> <rdf:type> <ex:HumanBeing> . Case 4: <ex:HumanBeing> <rdfs:comment> "ex:HumanBeing is the class of all human beings." . <ex:Jane> <rdfs:comment> "Jane is a human being" . ?universally-entail? <ex:Jane> <rdf:type> <ex:HumanBeing> . Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 15:51:27 UTC