- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:07:41 +0200
- To: "Giles Hogben" <giles.hogben@jrc.it>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFOEAKFJAA.danny666@virgilio.it>
Google 'notation3' --- Danny Ayers <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff> -----Original Message----- From: www-rdf-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-comments-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Giles Hogben Sent: 10 April 2002 10:19 To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org; Dan Connolly Subject: APPEL rules in RDF Sorry but I can't understand the syntax used in these docs (e.g. "log:racine [log:semantics :F]" ).. Any hints? > On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 09:22, Giles Hogben wrote: > [...] > > 2. I couldn't find anywhere the rule that you said you made work - is that > > available to have a look at > > yes... > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/p3p/p3pAArules.n3 > > all the raw materials are references, one way or another, from > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/p3p/Makefile > > Sorry to be so brief and cryptic; having trouble > making time for this conversation. > > If we're to continue > this discussion in substance, it'll help me a lot if > we can copy www-archive@w3.org (or p3p-dev or any > other relevant public forum) so that I can refer > to it later. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/ > > > 3. How does this work relate to the P3P RDF Schema > > This rules stuff was my way of reviewing the P3P RDF Schema. > > I mostly followed it, but I think not completely; I tried > to leave breadcrumbs where I departed. > > > - does the RDF it > > produces validate against it? > > Umm... I think so. > > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org >
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 05:13:10 UTC