- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 15:02:14 +0100
- To: jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Jeremy,
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0014.html
you raised an issue which was captured in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-charmod-literals
as
[[[
Does the treatment of literals conform to charmod ?
]]]
As recorded in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0056.html
the RDFCore WG has decided to close this issue by approving test cases
white, black 1 and black 2 submitted
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0016.html
for consideration. The grey test cases were not approved; instead the WG
decided to add text to the syntax specification pointing out that literals
beginning with a combining character may not be serializable in RDF/XML,
depending on the outcome of CHARMOD, and may cause interoperability problems.
Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 10:05:12 UTC