- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:10:30 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Re: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use [[[ Clarify the legality of the use of names from the RDF namespace, e.g. can rdf:Bag be used as a property or can rdf:Description be used as a property attribute etc. ]]] I added to the syntax WD the names in the RDF namespace. The names allowed in property attributes are just an example of the things that need to be defined. The names allowed as typed node elements are another set. The current syntax WD defines the complete set of names in http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20011218/#section-Namespace and gives allowed values for each of the other cases. If may be incomplete but at least it does list them. I suspect rdf:li and rdf:_n are still allowed in as a node when they shouldn't. I expect Jeremy will shout out where this is wrong. The issue resolution in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0651.html doesn't cover all of the cases, and probably doesn't close it completely. Maybe there need to be test cases for all the legal and illegal use of rdf:* for typedNodes and propertyElt for example. Dave
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 14:13:43 UTC