- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:39:42 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
hi all In the IRC meeting yesterday (26th Feb 2003), we made some decisions about datestamp, x-properties, and bugzilla, and postponed the issue about GPLed code into W3C site. We didn't get to pathcross (http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046279142.860278) Agenda for Feb 26th meeting: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Feb/0013.html The next meeting is march 12th 2003, 17:00 UTC http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=3&year=2003&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=0] on irc.freenode.net #rdfig Agenda will follow nearer the time. Please send me suggestions for it. Summary of the meeting 1 datestamps (why aren't they considered as datetimes?) [[ <DanC> E:RESOLVED: all is well. nothing needs changing. datestamp in this test case is ok. ]] http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046275343.439413 2. x-properties - at the moment you have to pass the x-property url to ical2rdf - might it be possible to get this from the prodid string or somesuch? Is this the only product-specific additional information needed? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Jan/0012.html [[ I: RESOLVED to institute an ical product registry ala 'http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/prod/' + firstFew(prodID) + hash(prodId) and to put RDF schemas there based on data we find from deployed products I:action libby: implement it, add/update some tests ]] http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046279854.884486 [[ J:action libby: have a go at figuring it out, documenting it ]] http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046281084.080137 3. will the mailing list do for this kind of thing, or would bugzilla help? [[ <DanC> F:RESOLVED: try the wiki instead for a while? ]] http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046275378.056795 Wiki is http://esw.w3.org/t/view/ESW/RdfCalendar 4. is it OK to check GPL'd code in under http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ ? [[ just to keep expectations modest... we can put that on the agenda, but we can't really make decisions about it. ]] Dan Connolly, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Feb/0012.html [[ 18:37:06 <libby> G:POSTPONED ]] on the grounds that DanC isn't sure he can contribute to GPLed software, and it would be good to have all the code under a single license. At the moment, the java code is GPLed because it depends on Daniel Resare's GPLed parser. [[ 18:26:48 <libby> I gues I could alk daniel if he feels like releaseing his code as non GPL, no idea if he would say yes ]] cheers Libby
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 13:42:45 UTC