meeting notes from IRC RDF calendar meeting: 26th Feb 2003, 17:00 GMT

hi all

In the IRC meeting yesterday (26th Feb 2003), we made some decisions
about datestamp, x-properties, and bugzilla, and postponed the issue
about GPLed code into W3C site. We didn't get to pathcross
(http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046279142.860278)

Agenda for Feb 26th meeting:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Feb/0013.html

The next meeting is march 12th 2003, 17:00 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=3&year=2003&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=0]

on irc.freenode.net #rdfig

Agenda will follow nearer the time. Please send me suggestions for it.


Summary of the meeting

1  datestamps (why aren't they considered as datetimes?)
[[
<DanC> E:RESOLVED: all is well. nothing needs changing. datestamp in
this test case is ok.
]]
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046275343.439413

2.  x-properties - at the moment you have to pass the x-property url
to ical2rdf - might it be possible to get this from the prodid string or
somesuch? Is this the only product-specific additional information
needed?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Jan/0012.html

[[
I: RESOLVED to institute an ical product registry ala
'http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/prod/' + firstFew(prodID) + hash(prodId)
and to put RDF schemas there based on data we find from deployed
products
I:action libby: implement it, add/update some tests
]]
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046279854.884486

[[
J:action libby: have a go at figuring it out, documenting it
]]
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046281084.080137

3.  will the mailing list do for this kind of thing, or would bugzilla
help?
[[
<DanC> F:RESOLVED: try the wiki instead for a while?
]]
http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/02/26/2003-02-26.html#1046275378.056795

Wiki is
http://esw.w3.org/t/view/ESW/RdfCalendar

4.  is it OK to check GPL'd code in under
http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ ?
[[
just to keep expectations modest... we can put
that on the agenda, but we can't really make decisions about it.
]]
Dan Connolly,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Feb/0012.html

[[
18:37:06  <libby> G:POSTPONED
]]
on the grounds that DanC isn't sure he can contribute to GPLed software,
and it would be good to have all the code under a single license. At the
moment, the java code is GPLed because it depends on Daniel Resare's
GPLed parser.

[[
18:26:48  <libby> I gues I could alk daniel if he feels like releaseing
his code as non GPL, no idea if he would say yes
]]


cheers

Libby

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 13:42:45 UTC