W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > October to December 2003

RE: namespace node implementation

From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:56:34 +0200
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106073DD205@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>, www-ql@w3.org
> > The tricky thing is that when you come to serialize, the XML 1.0
> > serialization is
> >
> > <c xmlns:ns2="NS2"><b xmlns:ns1="NS1" ns1:x="X"/></c>
> >
> > but the more accurate XML 1.1 serialization is:
> >
> > <c xmlns:ns2="NS2"><b xmlns:ns2="" xmlns:ns1="NS1" ns1:x="X"/></c>
> ? which of the 1.1 documents implies this? is there something other 
> than the december namespaces cr or the recent xml cr, or is this 
> somehow expressed in c14n?

It's not implied by the namespaces specifications, it's implied by the XPath
serialization spec, which places the requirement on serialization that it
should "round trip": that is, it should generate the textual XML which, when
reparsed, will give you back the data model you started with. The data model
allows a namespace to be in scope for a parent element without being in
scope for its child element; this cannot round-trip through a 1.0
serialization, but it can round-trip through a 1.1 serialization.

Michael Kay
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2003 18:57:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:43 UTC