- From: Xavier Franc <xfranc@online.fr>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:54:44 +0200
- To: www-ql@w3.org
Rectification: what I wrote is not correct according to the latest draft: there is no choice, the first possibility *must* be selected. In fact the Aug 2003 WD is quite precise about the hole question of NS nodes. > - when copying an existing node into a constructed tree, there is a choice about > copying in-scope prefix/ns mappings (aka "namespace nodes"): > 1- copy all in-scope mappings: more verbose output but > better chances to avoid creating synthetic namespace > declarations (something like xmlns:ns1="...") required by missing mappings. > 2- copy only mappings defined on the node itself: more concise > 3- copy no mappings at all: wont result in nice serialization > 4- copy only if used in sub-tree: best but not efficient > -- Xavier Franc
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 09:53:22 UTC