- From: Michael Brundage <xquery@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:05:12 -0700
- To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>, Untitled 2 <www-ql@w3.org>
Why not just emulate the behavior of existing XSLT implementations? As a user, that's the behavior I would expect. On 10/21/03 11:35 AM, "Per Bothner" <per@bothner.com> wrote: > I've been thinking about how to efficiently implement namespace "nodes". > (This is for serialization and get-in-scope-namespace only - I already > have efficient code for namespace resolution when parsing XML, and for > matching QNames.) >... >I think this produces correct and reasonable output for a modest >implementation price, but perhaps I'm missing something.
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2003 23:05:16 UTC