Why not just emulate the behavior of existing XSLT implementations? As a user, that's the behavior I would expect. On 10/21/03 11:35 AM, "Per Bothner" <per@bothner.com> wrote: > I've been thinking about how to efficiently implement namespace "nodes". > (This is for serialization and get-in-scope-namespace only - I already > have efficient code for namespace resolution when parsing XML, and for > matching QNames.) >... >I think this produces correct and reasonable output for a modest >implementation price, but perhaps I'm missing something.Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2003 23:05:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:43 UTC