- From: Mark R Maxey <Mark_R_Maxey@raytheon.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:12:56 -0500
- To: www-ql@w3.org
- CC: Mark_R_Maxey@raytheon.com
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:14:39 UTC
XQuery/XPath issue 228 & XSLT issue 155 state that built-in functions are in the F&O namespace with no controls on changing that namespace. In the 11/15/02 draft, I assumed that "xf" was used to refer to this namespace (though, it was not listed among the predefined namespaces in Namespace Declarations <http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xquery-20021115/#id-namespace-decls>). While I was looking at the 5/2/3 XQuery Use Cases 1.9.4.3 Q3 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xquery-use-cases-20030502/#d0e2160>, I noticed that built-in string manipulation function "starts-with" was qualified with the "xf" namespace. Is this a typo or is this still necessary? Did one of the imports change the default namespace for built-in functions? If "xf" is still a valid namespace, then shouldn't it be added to the list of predefined namespace in the 5/2/3 Namespace Declarations <http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#id-namespace-decls>?
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:14:39 UTC