- From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 09:40:41 -0500
- To: "Peter Fankhauser" <fankhaus@darmstadt.gmd.de>, <www-ql@w3.org>
At 12:50 PM 3/3/2001 +0100, Peter Fankhauser wrote: > > Or, to put it another way, does XQuery fulfill the XML Query > > Requirements any better than the Algebra would? I agree with everything Peter said in his response to Michael. >As pointed out above, the goals of the XQuery WD, and the >the goals of the XML Query Algebra WD are complementary, so >the question of which is "better" is hard to ask/answer. But indeed the >more they agree syntax wise without compromising their purpose >(readability vs. straightforward formalizability) the better. Right. If the Algebra and the Query Language were so different that mapping was not straightforward, I would wonder if we had done something wrong. Aligning the syntax is also a useful goal - after all, mapping is not an end in itself. Phil Wadler likes to say that the Algebra should be a subset of the Query Language. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 5 March 2001 09:39:27 UTC