RE: Issue 1041: ICS Good Practices: 1.2 A, B., C

The reason I wrote - add another column - is that given the example Lofton
showed us (webCGM) that is exactly what they did.  Since this is a
technique, and we already have columns, adding a column that contains the
link is one way to do this.  As you point out - not the only way.  We could
add another technique to advocate pointing to EARL or a testing webpage,
etc. 

--lynne

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-qa-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> Of Karl Dubost
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:59 AM
> To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org'
> Subject: Re: Issue 1041: ICS Good Practices: 1.2 A, B., C
> 
> 
> 
> Le 17 mars 2005, à 06:41, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit :
> 
> > Le mercredi 16 mars 2005 à 13:38 -0500, Karl Dubost a écrit :
> >>> In the latter case, add an additional column, to indicate the result
> >>> of executing the tests.  To avoid confusion as to what an ICS is, we
> >>> recommend, adding an additional column.
> >>
> >> By adding a column, do we mean something that we are adding a table to
> >> an HTML Table?
> >
> > I don't think we need that level of precision in the technique;
> 
> misunderstanding. :))) I don't want to go in that level of details. I
> was afraid it was the case...
> 
> > the way
> > we present the ICS, it's clearly tabular data (1 feature, and 4 items
> > to
> > complete for each feautre), so it is pretty clear what adding a column
> > means, whatever the representation format is in the end.
> 
> As in adding something in tabular data more than in a graph or
> something else. Tabular data not being the only possible form. But's
> it's fine with me. :)
> 
> 
> --
> Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
> W3C Conformance Manager
> *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 17 March 2005 13:51:42 UTC