W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2005

RE: Draft minutes Boston F2F, 4 Friday 2005 AM - story

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:17:42 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: "Lynne S. Rosenthal" <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>,www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 07:54 AM 3/14/2005 -0500, Lynne S. Rosenthal wrote:

>The point of the story is conveyed - that is, do good quality control
>(review your own work), and you may have less hassles, comments, rewriting,
>negativity, etc.  Whether the story is completely accurate is not really the
>point here.

I agree.  It's a good story.

But if it's not accurate, it should not be attributed (this applies for any 
attribution to *anyone*, not just the QA case).  So:

1.) leave as is, un-attributed
2.) or, add attribution and reword for accuracy.

Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 15:17:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:38 UTC