RE: Draft minutes Boston F2F, 4 Friday 2005 AM - story from Lofton Henderson on 2005-03-14 (www-qa-wg@w3.org from March 2005)

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:17:42 -0700
To: "Lynne S. Rosenthal" <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>,www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20050314081446.0485dc08@localhost>

At 07:54 AM 3/14/2005 -0500, Lynne S. Rosenthal wrote:

>The point of the story is conveyed - that is, do good quality control
>(review your own work), and you may have less hassles, comments, rewriting,
>negativity, etc.  Whether the story is completely accurate is not really the
>point here.

I agree.  It's a good story.

But if it's not accurate, it should not be attributed (this applies for any 
attribution to *anyone*, not just the QA case).  So:

1.) leave as is, un-attributed
2.) or, add attribution and reword for accuracy.

-Lofton.

Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 15:17:52 UTC