RE: Draft minutes Boston F2F, 4 Friday 2005 AM - story

The point of the story is conveyed - that is, do good quality control
(review your own work), and you may have less hassles, comments, rewriting,
negativity, etc.  Whether the story is completely accurate is not really the
point here. 

--lynne

> 
> Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 à 13:11 -0700, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> > >Section 5 Story ­ identify the group, QAWG.
> > >RESOLUTION:  agree with the TAG.  We won't be so modest and will come
> out
> > >of the closet.
> >
> > Summary:  if we're going to take attribution (which is fine with me), we
> > should revise it to be more accurate.
> 
> Unless you make a specific proposal, I'd rather keep it as is; while
> it's not 100% accurate, I think that our decision to proceed as we
> decided to should have been reconsidered if we had done the type of
> quality review we're suggesting.
> 
> >

Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 12:55:21 UTC