Re: QA WG Response to SpecGL comments

Dom and QAWG,

Thank you for addressing my comments. My acknowledgments
are here:
  http://www.w3.org/2003/09/ij-SpecGL.html

Summary: No objections, some suggestions.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

 - Ian

On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:00, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
> Dear Ian,
> 
> Thank you for your comments on Last Call WD of 
> "QA Framework:  Specification Guidelines" (SpecGL).  
> This is QAWG's response.
> 
> Your reply -- whether you accept or reject QAWG's disposition of your comments -- is requested by September 26, 2003.  If you do not reply by then, your default response is recorded as "Accept". If you need an extended deadline to send your comments, please let us know as soon as possible so that we can negotiate a new date.
> 
> You will find QAWG's response to your comments in the "Disposition of Comments" (DoC) document [1].  Please note that [1] is for Specification Guidelines only. Operational Guidelines and Introduction specifications are being handled separately.
> 
> In the descriptive information before the table in [1], you will find a complete description of the contents of the DoC table.
> 
> If you do not accept QAWG's disposition of your comments, please provide details, including:   your reasons; and, what changes to the dispositions would be required to satisfy you.
> 
> Please copy the QAWG list on your reply (www-qa-wg@w3.org -- the Cc: of this message).
> 
> Regards,
> For Lofton Henderson (QAWG co-chair, for the QAWG),
> Dominique Hazael-Massieux, SpecGL Lead Editor
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/SpecGL-DoC
> More specifically, the responses to your comments start at:
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 17:14:54 UTC