Re: [Draft] Minutes of QA WG teleconf 2003-12-18

Here is what I captured for the TA discussion.....


>3.) TA list for SpecGL
>
>         Abstract: Mark Skall has sent [2] the test assertions for Spec 
> Guidelines. The QA working group has started the review of these Test 
> Assertions to identify ambiguities and concordance with the conformance 
> requirements in the specifications.  We haven't finished and will 
> continue on the next call the 22nd of Decembre.
>
>[Scribe has a very poor record of the discussion which were very 
>technical. Proposition of organization for the next call to help the scribe.
>         1. CP Number
>                 Someone announces the CP number of the Test Assertions
>         2. Issue
>                 He/She defines the issue with one clear sentence.
>         3. Discussion
>                 People discuss about it clearly
>         4. Decision
>                 The person express one or more resolutions that the 
> scribe can write clearly.
>]
>
>[*** A lot of missed discussions ***]
>
>         Number: CP 2.2
>         Issue: Dependance of the execution 2.1
>         Decision: to reword the Conformance Requirements and the test 
> assertions to s/in CP 2.1/in the specification/
>
>         Number: CP 2.3:
>         Issue: Missing the second MUST of the conformance req.
>         Decision: Reformulate the test assertion accordingly to the 
> missing MUST
>
>         Number: CP 2.4
>         Issue: other dimensions seems too general and might confuse people.
>         Decision: s/other dimensions/other dimensions that are used/
>
>
>Karl: I recommend we start now the work of Test Assertions and Test 
>Materials for the Test GL to avoid what we are doing now, that could have 
>been achieved earlier.
>
>4.) Adjourn
>
>Next Telconf: Monday 22th.
>                 Only dedicated to this discussion.
>
>
>--
>Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
>W3C Conformance Manager
>*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
>
>

Received on Friday, 19 December 2003 09:41:09 UTC