- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:32:07 -0500
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Here is what I captured for the TA discussion..... >3.) TA list for SpecGL > > Abstract: Mark Skall has sent [2] the test assertions for Spec > Guidelines. The QA working group has started the review of these Test > Assertions to identify ambiguities and concordance with the conformance > requirements in the specifications. We haven't finished and will > continue on the next call the 22nd of Decembre. > >[Scribe has a very poor record of the discussion which were very >technical. Proposition of organization for the next call to help the scribe. > 1. CP Number > Someone announces the CP number of the Test Assertions > 2. Issue > He/She defines the issue with one clear sentence. > 3. Discussion > People discuss about it clearly > 4. Decision > The person express one or more resolutions that the > scribe can write clearly. >] > >[*** A lot of missed discussions ***] > > Number: CP 2.2 > Issue: Dependance of the execution 2.1 > Decision: to reword the Conformance Requirements and the test > assertions to s/in CP 2.1/in the specification/ > > Number: CP 2.3: > Issue: Missing the second MUST of the conformance req. > Decision: Reformulate the test assertion accordingly to the > missing MUST > > Number: CP 2.4 > Issue: other dimensions seems too general and might confuse people. > Decision: s/other dimensions/other dimensions that are used/ > > >Karl: I recommend we start now the work of Test Assertions and Test >Materials for the Test GL to avoid what we are doing now, that could have >been achieved earlier. > >4.) Adjourn > >Next Telconf: Monday 22th. > Only dedicated to this discussion. > > >-- >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ >W3C Conformance Manager >*** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > >
Received on Friday, 19 December 2003 09:41:09 UTC