- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:42:58 -0400
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
That is what we said. Lynne At 08:11 PM 4/17/2003, you wrote: >I'm updating the issues list, and need a clarification... > >At 09:46 AM 4/16/03 -0400, Mark Skall wrote: >>[...] >>Issues 16 and 39 Section 8.4 Consistent handling of discretionary >>choices. Comments asked that "document the identified policies" be >>clarified and the need to make it simpler. This checkpoint has a history >>of being rewritten. It seems to be a difficult concept to describe clearly. >> >>Alternatives: >> >>1. try again and rewrite >>2. delete the checkpoint >>3. leave as is. >> >>LR: This checkpoint needs to be clarified. It's not clear what the >>conformance requirement is. >> >>SM: The key phrase is "identify documented policies" What do we mean by >>this? >> >>DM (with Dom and Lofton) will re-write the conformance requirement and >>checkpoint for 8.4 (Action Item) Date:4/25/03. > >I recall advocating/discussing that we would try to achieve a simple >clarification that everyone is happy with, and failing that would remove >the checkpoint. I.e.: Draft clarification; review; accept or delete. > >Is this something that we agreed as part of the Resolution? > >-Lofton.
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 08:43:23 UTC