- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:11:18 -0600
- To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
I'm updating the issues list, and need a clarification... At 09:46 AM 4/16/03 -0400, Mark Skall wrote: >[...] >Issues 16 and 39 Section 8.4 Consistent handling of discretionary >choices. Comments asked that "document the identified policies" be >clarified and the need to make it simpler. This checkpoint has a history >of being rewritten. It seems to be a difficult concept to describe clearly. > >Alternatives: > >1. try again and rewrite >2. delete the checkpoint >3. leave as is. > >LR: This checkpoint needs to be clarified. It's not clear what the >conformance requirement is. > >SM: The key phrase is "identify documented policies" What do we mean by this? > >DM (with Dom and Lofton) will re-write the conformance requirement and >checkpoint for 8.4 (Action Item) Date:4/25/03. I recall advocating/discussing that we would try to achieve a simple clarification that everyone is happy with, and failing that would remove the checkpoint. I.e.: Draft clarification; review; accept or delete. Is this something that we agreed as part of the Resolution? -Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 20:09:30 UTC