- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:11:17 -0600
- To: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@sun.com>, Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Peter Fawcett <pfawcett@real.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
I think that we should compress the schedule somewhat. It shows a 3rd *internal* draft on 5/23, which is two months late according to: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/Roadmap (And, it is considerably longer than the "every-three-month" convention for WD publication.) Since this is just a 2nd PWD, I think that we could cut out at least one and preferably two internal drafts. I would rather publish soon, with the idea to publish again soon after Crete. Other thoughts? -Lofton. At 11:55 AM 4/10/03 -0700, Patrick Curran wrote: >Internal... > >Kirill Gavrylyuk wrote: > >>Are these internal drafts or actual public drafts? >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Peter Fawcett [mailto:pfawcett@real.com] >>>Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 11:11 AM >>>To: www-qa-wg@w3.org >>>Cc: Patrick.Curran@sun.com >>>Subject: Publication Schedule for TestGL (AI-20030331-1) >>> >>> >>>Howdy folks, >>>This is what Patrick and I have come up with for a proposed schedule >>>of TestGL publication dates. >>> >>>- 4/18: first draft. >>>- 5/2: second draft. >>>- 5/23: third draft. >>> >>>The first draft probably will need some discussion, we can then >>>update it a bit and post it as a working draft for the second draft >>>and continue to work on it. Dates much beyond that are pretty fuzzy. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Peter >>> >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 15:09:39 UTC