- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:06:01 -0400
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Never mind, I see that Olivier is taking care of WCAG. I'll do what ever you assigned me - so XLink it will be. grumble, grumble Lynne At 07:25 AM 10/22/2002, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: >I don't know how many times to email this, but I have asked that I not be >assigned to XLink and to do one of the WAI Guidelines - e.g., WCAG >instead. Can you please make the change in the Matrix. > >thank you >Lynne > > >At 01:37 PM 10/21/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote: > >>QAWG -- >> >>Please have a look at: >> >>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews >> >>We have picked due dates for the Techniques Analysis assignments (column >>4) for SpecGL and OpsGL: 16-December-2002. This date is chosen with the >>goal that the Extech editors can integrate the results and have a strong >>ET draft for input to January face-to-face. >> >>Note. Some people now have assignments due on both 12/15 and >>12/16. Given that the due dates are about 8 weeks hence, and given that >>SpecGL and OpsGL will both be available by 6 November (about 6 weeks in >>advance) ... it would make sense to get the review assignments (column >>1/2) out of the way earlier rather than later. >> >>I thought I heard Karl say something about a reward for early completion >>(any SpecGL assignments) -- 1 beer or other beverage of choice for each >>week that you're early! (Did I get it right, Karl?) >> >>-Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 09:12:37 UTC