- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:25:01 -0400
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
I don't know how many times to email this, but I have asked that I not be assigned to XLink and to do one of the WAI Guidelines - e.g., WCAG instead. Can you please make the change in the Matrix. thank you Lynne At 01:37 PM 10/21/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote: >QAWG -- > >Please have a look at: > >http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews > >We have picked due dates for the Techniques Analysis assignments (column >4) for SpecGL and OpsGL: 16-December-2002. This date is chosen with the >goal that the Extech editors can integrate the results and have a strong >ET draft for input to January face-to-face. > >Note. Some people now have assignments due on both 12/15 and >12/16. Given that the due dates are about 8 weeks hence, and given that >SpecGL and OpsGL will both be available by 6 November (about 6 weeks in >advance) ... it would make sense to get the review assignments (column >1/2) out of the way earlier rather than later. > >I thought I heard Karl say something about a reward for early completion >(any SpecGL assignments) -- 1 beer or other beverage of choice for each >week that you're early! (Did I get it right, Karl?) > >-Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 07:31:29 UTC