RE: clarification - time needed for TestGL

> I think that probably will have to wait until we see more about
Dimitris'

> proposals, and what Kirill comes up with (new text, issues list, etc).

 

I don't think we need new text from me to estimate the time for Test GL
issues on the f2f. Here is what I sent earlier this week [1]. It will
take 3-4h, based on the previous teleconf's rate.

 

=====================================

>Review the fixes for the issues brought up on the last special TestGL 

>telcon. See issues list [2] and minutes [3]. I won't be able to send
the 

>revised draft this week. Most likely will do so on Monday 10/7, right

>before the f2f. Big items:

 

-        Issue 79 - alternative formulation of the checkpoints to be
more result oriented then process oriented

-        Guideline 3  - fuzzy, review of the rewrite

-        Go through Gd 4 - 7.

 

>Estimated time required - 3-4h

 

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Oct/0006.html 

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Sep/0067.html

[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Oct/0002.html

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 7:01 AM
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Subject: clarification

 

 

This is perhaps not very clear...

 

At 06:58 AM 10/4/2002 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>[...]

>As I understand, this is a refinement of Day1 P.M. items.  There were 

>three main items:  #1 and #2 below, and "test demos".  The third has
been 

>proposed for migration elsewhere, but we don't yet know where all (or 

>part) of it might go.  (Note:  the current agenda shows "demos" with
two 

>things in parens -- per my earlier message, it was supposed to be a 

>comma-list of three items.)

 

The current day 1 P.M. at [1] should have been:

-----

Afternoon:

         *test tools (i.e., test sub-group)

         *TA markup (i.e., questionnaire)

         *demos

                 -...list of demos...

 

So Dimitris' contribution is a refinement for and replacement of the
first 

two bullets for the afternoon.

 

And as I said, we know that we have too much with all the demos there,
but 

haven't decided yet where to move them.  I think that probably will have
to 

wait until we see more about Dimitris' proposals, and what Kirill comes
up 

with (new text, issues list, etc).

 

-Lofton.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/10/f2f