- From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:23:28 -0700
- To: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <B3F0DACD72892E4DB7E8296C6C9FC2F60507548B@red-msg-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
There are not many significant raised issues for the document yet, so I didn't even sent email. I think I should though. Here is the list that I want to discuss before drilling into the document: 1. Issue 79: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html.html#x79 2. Gd 4. How should we coordinate Ops and Test guidelines. Is it ok to duplicate checkpoints? 3. Ck 1.7 Identify optional behaviors in the specification. Do we keep this checkpoint or drop it? 4. Ck 3.1 and 3.2. Are these ckpts verifiable now? 5. Ck4.1 and 4.2 - could these be joined together? 6. Ck 5.7 - is it doable? The rest of the telecon time I suggest we dedicate to the Gd4 and higher. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:40 AM To: Kirill Gavrylyuk Subject: testGL issues FYI, there is a single TestGL issue in the issues list: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html.html#x79 -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 10:24:47 UTC