- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:30:18 -0600
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Good minutes, thanks Dom. A couple of small comments... At 04:42 PM 10/3/02 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >Please send complements and corrections before Wednesday next week. > >[...] > >Absent: >(PF) Peter Fawcett (RealNetworks) >(AT) Andrew Thackrah (Open Group) >(JM) Jack Morrison (Sun) Jack sent his regrets to me, just before the meeting. Sorry for not making that clear. >[...] >Tokyo's agenda >Since a new and possibly big agenda item has been proposed on the WG's >future, the question of where to put it in the agenda arises. >Lofton thinks that this item is important enough to remove some other >items, maybe some part of test GL or some demos. Dimitris would rather >not make his demos than not work on Test GL. Perhaps I misunderstood -- correct me if I'm wrong, Dimitris -- but I thought Dimitris' comment was more about the TA markup topic (incl. questionnaire results and possible follow up), and the Test Task Team (Test sub-group) topic. As opposed to the TestGL topic, which is to review and discuss issues on the expected (Monday) new TestGL draft. >Lofton stresses that demos >are an important part of the meeting, since they are at the core of our >substantial work, but agrees that we might cut some of them. To be more specific, I consider the test-materials demos to be the first bit of substantive work -- as opposed to proposal and planning -- for potential Test task team projects. They should provide us with an orientation, foundation, and help establish common understanding and vocabulary for test materials work. Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:28:52 UTC