Re: Draft minutes QA WG Telecon 2002-10-02

comment inlined
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 05:30  PM, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>
> Good minutes, thanks Dom.  A couple of small comments...
>
> At 04:42 PM 10/3/02 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
>> Please send complements and corrections before Wednesday next week.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Absent:
>> (PF) Peter Fawcett (RealNetworks)
>> (AT) Andrew Thackrah (Open Group)
>> (JM) Jack Morrison (Sun)
>
> Jack sent his regrets to me, just before the meeting.  Sorry for not 
> making that clear.
>
>> [...]
>> Tokyo's agenda
>> Since a new and possibly big agenda item has been proposed on the WG's
>> future, the question of where to put it in the agenda arises.
>> Lofton thinks that this item is important enough to remove some other
>> items, maybe some part of test GL or some demos. Dimitris would rather
>> not make his demos than not work on Test GL.
>
> Perhaps I misunderstood -- correct me if I'm wrong, Dimitris -- but I 
> thought Dimitris' comment was more about the TA markup topic (incl.  
> questionnaire results and possible follow up), and the Test Task Team 
> (Test sub-group) topic.  As opposed to the TestGL topic, which is to 
> review and discuss issues on the expected (Monday) new TestGL draft.
>
[dd] Correct, I want to have TA and Test Group topic and in order to 
make room for it I could consider spending less time on my DOM demo

>> Lofton stresses that demos
>> are an important part of the meeting, since they are at the core of our
>> substantial work, but agrees that we might cut some of them.
>
> To be more specific, I consider the test-materials demos to be the 
> first bit of substantive work -- as opposed to proposal and planning -- 
> for potential Test task team projects.  They should provide us with an 
> orientation, foundation, and help establish common understanding and 
> vocabulary for test materials work.
>
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
>

Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:52:37 UTC